Machine building
A machine must position parts within ±0.05 mm. Thermal deformation and play prevent this. The company develops a stiffer construction and compensation method.
BOTTLENECK → OWN DIRECTION → TECHNICAL PROOF
PHYSICAL PRODUCTS · MACHINES · COMPONENTS
The development of a physical product, machine, device or component can qualify for WBSO when the solution is technically new for your company and you have to solve technical bottlenecks yourself. The product does not have to be new to the market or unique worldwide. There must be technical risks or uncertainties, and you must demonstrate the operating principle of the solution yourself.
BY PETER KLAREN · UPDATED 19 SEPTEMBER 2026 · SOURCE: RVO WBSO GUIDE 2026
ON THIS PAGE
RVO assesses not only the end product, but above all the technical development process. A strong assessment follows four connected steps:
Which technically measurable performance do you want to achieve?
Why does this not work with your current knowledge or known solutions?
Which construction, material application, electronics or control engineering do you develop yourself?
With which prototypes and technical tests do you prove that the solution works?
Actuator example: a company wants to deliver twice as much force in the same dimensions. The existing geometry causes too much heat. The company therefore develops its own coil geometry and thermal path and demonstrates the operating principle with thermal and mechanical prototypes.
The general WBSO requirements continue to apply, but this page focuses on the physical development object.
New for your company is not the same as merely a new end product. The product does not have to be new worldwide, but your company must develop technical knowledge it does not yet possess. A solution that can be realised with generally known techniques, supplier components or an existing approach does not automatically become a WBSO project.
Technical novelty lies, for example, in an own construction principle, material concept, measurement method, electronic circuit or thermal solution whose feasibility is uncertain in advance. Read the in-depth page on technical novelty for WBSO.
| Situation | WBSO? | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| New product assembled from known components according to proven design principles | Usually not | The product is commercially new, but the technical realisation is known. |
| Making an existing product smaller with standard engineering | Usually not | Merely adjusting dimensions creates no technical development risk. |
| New construction due to an unachievable strength-to-weight ratio | Possibly yes | The company must develop a technically new construction itself. |
| Own measuring principle because existing sensors are not accurate enough | Possibly yes | The measuring principle and technical feasibility are still uncertain. |
| Reproducing an existing product | No | Reproduction is not own technical development. |
| New material concept with conflicting properties | Possibly yes | It is uncertain in advance whether the required material behaviour is achievable. |
A technical bottleneck is not a functional wish such as “the machine must be faster”. Describe which technical requirement is not met, which quantity runs out of control, which tolerance proves unachievable and why a known solution does not suffice. The bottleneck must connect to your own technical knowledge level.
| Field | Example technical bottleneck |
|---|---|
| Mechanics | Positioning accuracy is not achieved due to play, vibrations and deformation. |
| Thermal | A component exceeds the maximum temperature at the required power density. |
| Electronics | The signal-to-noise ratio is insufficient at the required measuring frequency. |
| Materials | A material combination delaminates under cyclic load. |
| Battery technology | Cell temperatures diverge during fast charging. |
| Medtech | A seal must remain sterilisable without loss of mechanical properties. |
| Sensor technology | Drift and hysteresis prevent the required measuring accuracy. |
An application becomes stronger when each bottleneck is linked to an own solution direction and concrete development activities. Merely listing risks without a technical development path is not sufficient.
A prototype can be part of R&D when it is exclusively needed to demonstrate the technical operating principle. If the prototype has potential user value — because it can be sold, used in services or used as a business asset — its build hours, costs and expenditures fall outside WBSO.
| Phase | WBSO |
|---|---|
| Experimental prototype solely to demonstrate the operating principle | Possibly yes |
| Prototype without user value that is subsequently destroyed or not usable | Possibly yes |
| Sellable prototype or prototype used as a business asset | Not for build hours, costs and expenditures of that prototype |
| Final product version after the operating principle has been demonstrated | Not |
RVO sorting machine example: an experimental version in structural steel may be needed to demonstrate the operating principle. The later final version in stainless steel is product realisation and no longer falls under R&D.
The WBSO development project ends as soon as the technical operating principle has been demonstrated. Product engineering, certification, industrialisation and production preparation usually follow.
The line runs between technical development and regular realisation. Hours must directly relate to solving technical bottlenecks and demonstrating the operating principle.
| Activity | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Developing a new construction or operating principle | Yes/possibly |
| Building technical prototypes to demonstrate the operation | Yes/possibly |
| Technically developing a new material application | Yes/possibly |
| Technical tests aimed at uncertainties in the operating principle | Yes/possibly |
| Styling, ergonomics and design | Not |
| Rebuilding an existing product | Not |
| Routine engineering with known methods | Not |
| Functional testing after the operating principle is established | Not |
| Scaling up without a new technical problem | Not |
| Preparing or starting production | Not |
Record per employee and per day during the project which technical activities were carried out. See the requirements for WBSO administration.
In addition to R&D wages, direct costs and expenditures can count. The relationship with your own R&D must be clear and exclusively serve the project. With a prototype, the potential user value is especially decisive.
| Cost or expenditure | Possible WBSO? |
|---|---|
| Materials processed in an experimental prototype without user value | Yes, possibly |
| External party building an experimental prototype | Costs possibly |
| New measuring equipment specifically for R&D tests | Possibly as an expenditure |
| Hire of specific test equipment | Possibly as costs |
| Production materials for sellable prototypes | No |
| Hired R&D engineer | Not as labour costs |
| Market research | No |
| Patent costs | No |
| Start-up and setup of production | No |
You make the choice between the costs allowance and actual costs for the calendar year. Read which items and supporting documents are needed at WBSO costs and expenditures and compare the financial outcome with WBSO calculator.
The following situations illustrate where physical product development can become technically uncertain. They are anonymised example situations, not claims about specific clients.
A machine must position parts within ±0.05 mm. Thermal deformation and play prevent this. The company develops a stiffer construction and compensation method.
BOTTLENECK → OWN DIRECTION → TECHNICAL PROOF
Local temperature peaks occur during fast charging. The company develops its own cooling geometry and control strategy and tests several cell configurations.
BOTTLENECK → OWN DIRECTION → TECHNICAL PROOF
Existing measuring principles show too much drift. The company develops a new sensor configuration and compensation electronics.
BOTTLENECK → OWN DIRECTION → TECHNICAL PROOF
A sterile fluid connection must withstand hundreds of cleaning cycles. Available seals lose mechanical properties, after which an own sealing concept is developed.
BOTTLENECK → OWN DIRECTION → TECHNICAL PROOF
A bio-based composite must be impact-resistant and thermally stable at the same time. Existing formulations do not achieve both properties, so new fibre-matrix combinations are tested.
BOTTLENECK → OWN DIRECTION → TECHNICAL PROOF
A compact converter exceeds the temperature and EMC limits. The company develops a new topology, PCB layout and heat dissipation.
BOTTLENECK → OWN DIRECTION → TECHNICAL PROOF
View more WBSO examples of product development and the anonymised case on precision positioning.
This page is about the physical development object: a machine, device, product, component, material, sensor, battery system or electronic system. The technical novelty lies in the operation or construction of that object.
Are you not developing the product itself, but a technically new method to produce, process or assemble a product? Then the focus lies on the production process. In that case see WBSO for process development. This delineation prevents product and process bottlenecks from becoming mixed up.
A convincing project description makes the technical reasoning verifiable. Do not start with market potential or product benefits, but with the technical starting situation and uncertainty.
Use the extensive guide for a strong WBSO project description and the step-by-step plan for applying for WBSO.
When the solution is technically new for your company, contains concrete technical bottlenecks, feasibility is uncertain in advance and you develop and demonstrate the operating principle yourself.
No. Technically new for your company is decisive. A commercially new product realised exclusively with known techniques does not automatically qualify.
An experimental prototype without user value can count under conditions if it is needed to demonstrate the operating principle.
Potential sale or other use can mean the prototype has user value. Assess this carefully in advance; build hours and costs may then fall outside WBSO.
Materials for an experimental prototype without user value can count as direct R&D costs if the other conditions are met.
The external build costs of a qualifying experimental prototype may possibly count. Hired labour hours do not count as own R&D hours.
Not when it concerns solely styling, ergonomics or design. Only own technical development around concrete technical bottlenecks can qualify.
For WBSO, the development project ends as soon as the technical operating principle has been demonstrated. Product realisation and production preparation afterwards are not R&D.
Have it assessed without obligation where the technical development begins, which prototypes count and how to scope the project for WBSO.
SOURCES AND SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW
Reviewed by Peter Klaren, WBSO specialist since 2004. Last substantively updated: 21 September 2026.